From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soto v. Prack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 10, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 1723 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

521336

03-10-2016

In the Matter of JOSE SOTO, Petitioner, v. ALBERT PRACK, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Jose Soto, Malone, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Before: Garry, J.P., Lynch, Devine and Clark, JJ.

Jose Soto, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Determination confirmed. No opinion.

Garry, J.P., Lynch, Devine and Clark, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Soto v. Prack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 10, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 1723 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Soto v. Prack

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSE SOTO, Petitioner, v. ALBERT PRACK, as Director of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 10, 2016

Citations

2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 1723 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)