Song Fi Inc. v. Google, Inc.

2 Citing briefs

  1. Free Range Content, Inc. v. Google Inc.

    MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third Amended Class Action Complaint

    Filed October 13, 2015

    Courts routinely enforce the terms of form agreements, even against unsophisticated consumers, and even where the agreements are presented in “take-it-or-leave-it” form by large companies. See, e.g., Song Fi Inc. v. Google, Inc., No. 14-cv-5080, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75272, *16-18 (N.D. Cal. June 10, 2015) (enforcing YouTube’s terms of service granting YouTube the right to determine whether content violates such terms “in its sole discretion”); Woods v. Google Inc., 889 F. Supp. 2d 1182, 1187 (N.D. Cal. 2012); Craigslist, Inc. v. Naturemarket, Inc., 694 F. Supp. 2d 1039, 1059 (N.D. Cal. 2010). The inability to negotiate a contract does not by itself establish oppression, as the inquiry looks to the totality of the circumstances at the time of contracting.

  2. Patel v. Facebook, Inc.

    REPLY

    Filed November 24, 2015

    s, 173 Cal. App. 4th Supp. 1 (2009) ..............................................................................................3 Schroeder v. Rynel, Ltd., Inc., 720 A.2d 1164 (Me. 1998).........................................................................................................4 Sherman v. PremierGarage Sys., LLC, 2010 WL 3023320 (D. Ariz. July 30, 2010) ..............................................................................4 Soffin v. Echannel Network, Inc., 2014 WL 2938347 (S.D. Fla. June 30, 2014) ............................................................................2 Song fi Inc. v. Google, Inc., 72 F. Supp. 3d 53, 64 (D.D.C. 2014) .........................................................................................6 Case 3:15-cv-03747-JD Document 76 Filed 11/24/15 Page 4 of 15 iv FACEBOOK’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS; MASTER CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03747-JD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Song fi Inc. v. Google, Inc., 2015 WL 3624335 (N.D. Cal. June 10, 2015) .......................................................................3, 4 Swanson v. Image Bank, Inc., 77 P.3d 439 (Ariz. 2003)............................................................................................................4 Tech Data Corp. v. AU Optronics Corp., 2012 WL 3236065 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2012) ............................................................................2 Wash. Mut. Bank, FA v. Super. Ct., 24 Cal. 4th 906 (2001) ...............................................................................................................3 Statutes 28 U.S.C. § 1961..............................................................................................................................4 720 ILCS 5/14 et seq......................................................................................................................10 740 ILCS 14/5(a) ........................................................................................................................