Solorio
v.
People

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIAJul 21, 2016
Case No. 1:16-cv-00472-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 21, 2016)

Case No. 1:16-cv-00472-SKO (PC)

07-21-2016

ANSELMO SOLORIO, Plaintiff, v. PEOPLE, Defendant.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER AND TO PAY FILING FEE OR FILE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

(Doc.3)

30-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff, Anselmo Solorio, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 18, 2016, an order issued for Plaintiff to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis, or to pay the filing fee within 45 days. (Doc. 3.) Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court's order. (Id.) Plaintiff was warned that recommendation for dismissal would issue if he failed to obey the order. (Id.)

A civil action may not proceed absent the submission of either the filing fee or a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. Based on Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's order, dismissal of this action is appropriate. In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability Litigation, 460 F.3d 1217, 1226 (9th Cir. 2006); Local Rule 110.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's order and to pay the filing fee or file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis.

These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 30 days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may file written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 21 , 2016

/s/ Sheila K . Oberto


UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE