From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solis v. Keolis RTC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 13, 2020
Case No.: 2:19-cv-00930-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Feb. 13, 2020)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:19-cv-00930-APG-EJY

02-13-2020

BRIGIDO D. SOLIS, Plaintiff v. KEOLIS RTC, Defendant


Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case

[ECF No. 6]

On January 24, 2020, Magistrate Judge Youchah recommended that I dismiss this case with prejudice because plaintiff Brigido Solis did not file an amended complaint as directed and because he has not taken any other action to prosecute this case. ECF No. 6. Solis did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made"); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) ("the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise" (emphasis in original)).

I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Youchah's report and recommendation (ECF No. 6) is accepted. Plaintiff Brigido Solis's complaint (ECF No. 1-1) is DISMISSED with prejudice. The clerk of court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case.

DATED this 13th day of February, 2020.

/s/_________

ANDREW P. GORDON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Solis v. Keolis RTC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 13, 2020
Case No.: 2:19-cv-00930-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Feb. 13, 2020)
Case details for

Solis v. Keolis RTC

Case Details

Full title:BRIGIDO D. SOLIS, Plaintiff v. KEOLIS RTC, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 13, 2020

Citations

Case No.: 2:19-cv-00930-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Feb. 13, 2020)