Softvault Sys., Inc.v.Sybase, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIAJul 9, 2012
CASE NO. 5:12-CV-1099 LHK (N.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2012)

CASE NO. 5:12-CV-1099 LHK

07-09-2012

SOFTVAULT SYSTEMS, INC. Plaintiff(s), v. SYBASE, INC. Defendant(s).

Alisa A. Lipski Attorney for Plaintiff Joseph M. Beauchamp Attorney for Defendant


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:

[ ] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
[ ] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
[ ] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)


(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

Private Process:

[√] Private ADR (please identify process and provider) The parties have agreed to private mediation and are working together to identify a mediator.

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

[ ] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)

[√] other requested deadline 30 days after claim construction hearing.

Alisa A. Lipski


Attorney for Plaintiff


Joseph M. Beauchamp


Attorney for Defendant


[PROPOSED
] ORDER

[×] The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.

[ ] The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lucy H. Koh


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation."