From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slaughter v. Ford Motor Credit Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 26, 1982
296 S.E.2d 775 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

64681.

DECIDED OCTOBER 26, 1982. REHEARING DENIED NOVEMBER 17, 1982.

Action on note. Gwinnett State Court. Before Judge Jackson.

G. Hughel Harrison, Samuel H. Harrison, for appellants.

Daniel F. Bridgers, for appellees.


The trial court granted summary judgment to Ford Motor Credit Company (Ford) for deficiency judgment against the debtor Slaughter following Ford's repossession of Slaughter's automobile and its sale at private sale. Slaughter appeals. Held:

The sole question on appeal is whether the question of commercial reasonability of a sale pursuant to Code Ann. § 109A-9-504 (3) is always a jury question, or may be determined by the trial court as a matter of law on motion for summary judgment.

Appellant contends the trial court can never grant summary judgment on the issue of commercial reasonability. In Ennis v. Atlas Finance Co., 120 Ga. App. 849, 850 ( 172 S.E.2d 482), we stated: "Having determined when and to whom the [sale] occurred, the jury may then pass upon its commercial reasonableness, considering the method, time, place, and terms. Neither the trial court nor this court should take upon itself such a determination." However, this statement in Ennis refers to the inappropriateness of a directed verdict for the creditor when the evidence raised questions concerning the commercial reasonability of the notice and method of sale. Determination of material issues of fact should always be left to the jury, and are not a proper subject of directed verdict or summary judgment. Code Ann. §§ 81A-150 (a); 81A-156. Appellant also cites Gordon v. Weldon, 154 Ga. App. 531, 532 ( 268 S.E.2d 796), for its supporting statement that Ennis, supra, holds "it is for the jury to determine the commercial reasonableness of a private sale of collateral under Ga. UCC § 9-504." In fact the Gordon decision means only that a trial judge may not confirm the sale of personalty under Code Ann. § 109A-9-504 as if it were governed by laws pertaining to confirmation of private sales of real property, which laws permit the trial judge to determine issues of fact. Code Ann. § 67-1503 et seq.

The commercial reasonability of a sale of personalty under Code Ann. § 109A-9-504 is as appropriate a subject of summary judgment as any other issue triable by a jury. Ultimately the commercial reasonability of a sale of repossessed collateral may be a question of law; where the creditor shows prima facie that the sale was reasonable, to prevent summary judgment the debtor must support his challenge to the sale by asserting specific facts showing there is a genuine issue for trial. See Hardin v. Norlin Music, 159 Ga. App. 167, 168 ( 283 S.E.2d 21); Code Ann. § 81A-156 (c) and (e). See also BVA Credit Corp. v. May, 152 Ga. App. 733, 734 ( 264 S.E.2d 32).

The appellee Ford Motor Company established by pleadings and affidavits that the sale of this repossessed automobile at the Atlanta Auto Auction was reasonable (see Richard v. Fulton Nat. Bank, 158 Ga. App. 595 ( 281 S.E.2d 338)). Appellant Slaughter showed nothing in dispute of this prima facie showing, except its general denial of reasonableness. Appellee Ford was entitled to summary judgment in the case. Code Ann. § 81A-156.

Judgment affirmed. McMurray, P. J., and Banke, J., concur.

DECIDED OCTOBER 26, 1982 — REHEARING DENIED NOVEMBER 17, 1982 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.


Summaries of

Slaughter v. Ford Motor Credit Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 26, 1982
296 S.E.2d 775 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Slaughter v. Ford Motor Credit Company

Case Details

Full title:SLAUGHTER et al. v. FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Oct 26, 1982

Citations

296 S.E.2d 775 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982)
296 S.E.2d 775

Citing Cases

Southeast Recovery Services, LLC v. Northen

Although normally a question of fact, the commercial reasonableness of the sale of collateral may be…

McMillian v. Bank South

Carter v. First Fed. c. Assn., 179 Ga. App. 532, 536 ( 347 S.E.2d 264) (1986). Commercial reasonability is an…