From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singh v. California Dept., of Corr. Rehabilitation

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 14, 2006
NO. CIV. S-06-0994 GEB DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2006)

Opinion

NO. CIV. S-06-0994 GEB DAD PS.

September 14, 2006


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


By an order filed August 10, 2006, plaintiff was ordered to submit the appropriate filing fee within twenty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The twenty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not paid the appropriate filing fee or otherwise responded to the court's order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Singh v. California Dept., of Corr. Rehabilitation

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 14, 2006
NO. CIV. S-06-0994 GEB DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2006)
Case details for

Singh v. California Dept., of Corr. Rehabilitation

Case Details

Full title:HARINDER SINGH, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 14, 2006

Citations

NO. CIV. S-06-0994 GEB DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2006)