Silver
v.
Kulongoski

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISIONOct 2, 2012
03:10-cv-01241-AC (D. Or. Oct. 2, 2012)

03:10-cv-01241-AC

10-02-2012

DAN SILVER, Plaintiff, v. TED KULONGOSKI; and the NATIONAL REPUBLICAN PARTY, Defendants.

Dan Silver Pro Se Plaintiff Marc Abrams OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Attorney for Defendant Ted Kulongoski


ORDER

Dan Silver

Pro Se Plaintiff Marc Abrams
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Attorney for Defendant Ted Kulongoski HERNANDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") (doc. #46) on September 6, 2012, recommending that the Motion to Dismiss (doc. #30) filed by Ted Kulongoski ("Defendant") be granted and that this case be dismissed with prejudice and without leave to amend. The F&R also recommends that the Motion for Oral Hearing filed by Dan Silver ("Plaintiff") (doc. #41) be denied.

Because no objections to the F&R were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation (doc. #46). Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (doc. #30) is GRANTED and this case is dismissed with prejudice and without leave to amend. Plaintiff's Motion for Oral Hearing (doc. #41) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________


MARCO A. HERNANDEZ


United States District Judge