Sherman v. RMH, LLC

1 Citing brief

  1. Marisa Lainer v. Uber Technologies Inc.

    RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration 17 and Dismiss or Stay Litigation

    Filed May 2, 2016

    See Sherman v. RMH, LLC, No. 13cv1986-WQH-WMc, 2014 WL 30318, at *9 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2014); Brown v. DirecTV, LLC, No. CV 12-08382 DMG (Ex), 2013 WL 3273811, at *5-6 (C.D. Cal. June 26, 2013); Cayanan v. Citi Holdings, Inc., 928 F. Supp. 2d 1182, 1208 (S.D. Cal. 2013); McNamara v. Royal Bank of Scotland Group, PLC, No. 11-cv-2137-L(WVG), 2012 WL 5392181, at *7 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2012).5 III. EVEN IF THE SCOPE OF THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT WAS AMBIGUOUS, AN ARBITRATOR MUST RESOLVE ARBITRABILITY.