Shechetv.Kim

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth CircuitJul 23, 2008
286 Fed. Appx. 430 (9th Cir. 2008)

No. 07-56614.

Submitted July 14, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed July 23, 2008.

Henry Patrick Nelson, Esq., Amber A. Logan, Esq., Nelson Fulton, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Margaret M. Morrow, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-07-04320-MMM.

Before: SCHROEDER, LEAVY and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court's order denying appellant's motion for preliminary injunctive relief and the district court's order denying appellant's motion for reconsideration. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record).

All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.