From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shatriya v. Gilden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 29, 2008
50 A.D.3d 586 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 3497.

April 29, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Judith J. Gische, J.), entered August 28, 2007, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant-appellant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action for breach of contract and a permanent injunction as against it, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Hoffman Law Firm, New York (Barbara Hofffman of counsel), for appellant.

Before: Saxe, J.P., Nardelli, Buckley and Catterson, JJ.


The motion court correctly held that an issue of fact as to the meaning of the term "PR" or "public relations" precludes summary judgment on the cause of action for breach of a contract allegedly prohibiting the posting of plaintiff model's photographs on the Internet. Injunctive relief may be available should plaintiff prevail on his cause of action for breach of contract and show that damages are an inadequate remedy. We have considered and rejected appellant's other arguments. [ See 16 Misc 3d 1137 (A), 2007 NY Slip Op 51717(U).]


Summaries of

Shatriya v. Gilden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 29, 2008
50 A.D.3d 586 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Shatriya v. Gilden

Case Details

Full title:WOLFGANG SHATRIYA, Respondent, v. BRUCE GILDEN et al., Defendants, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 29, 2008

Citations

50 A.D.3d 586 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 3959
855 N.Y.S.2d 366