From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shapiro, Bernstein Co. v. Continental Record

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 28, 1967
386 F.2d 426 (2d Cir. 1967)

Summary

holding that a corporation cannot appear other than by its attorney

Summary of this case from Pecarsky v. Galaxiworld.com Ltd.

Opinion

Nos. 199, 200, Dockets 31713, 31714.

Argued November 22, 1967.

Decided November 28, 1967.

Robert C. Osterberg, New York City (Julian T. Abeles, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants.

No appearance for defendant-appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and KAUFMAN and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.


Plaintiffs, eleven music publishers, brought suit in November 1964 against defendant, a New York corporation manufacturing phonograph records, for unauthorized use of copyrighted musical work. In December 1964, defendant's answer admitted that it had used the works in question, and that license agreements did exist; however, it denied that any royalties were due and owing. In April 1966, an order was entered in a companion case against defendant on the issue of liability, referring issues of damages to a special master. Shortly thereafter, defendant's attorneys, who also represented it in the companion case, moved to be relieved in this case; they claimed that the former owner of defendant, no stranger to this court, had sold his interest to another person "unknown" to the attorneys. Although plaintiffs opposed the motion because they feared further delay, it was granted in May 1966. However, defendant was directed by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to designate an attorney within fourteen days. The order also provided that if defendant failed to do so, "plaintiffs may move for such relief as they deem appropriate." No attorney has ever been designated. Plaintiffs attempted to file a note of issue to bring the case on for trial but were unable to do so because defendant had no attorney. Finally, in January 1967, plaintiffs moved for an interlocutory default judgment on the issue of liability pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 55; the motion also sought appointment of a special master to determine the amount of damages and a preliminary injunction against defendant pending entry of a final judgment. In July, the district court denied the motion and instructed plaintiffs to refile the note of issue, listing defendant corporation "as representing itself (Pro Se)." This appeal followed; defendant made no appearance in this court.

Chappell Co. v. Continental Record Co., 64 Civ. 3173 (S.D.N.Y., filed Oct. 20, 1964).

See Shapiro, Bernstein Co. v. Remington Records, Inc., 265 F.2d 263 (2d Cir. 1959), in which the actions of the former owner were similar to those alleged here.

Because the district court's order denied plaintiffs' request for a preliminary injunction, we have jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). It is clear that failure to grant that relief was error and reversal on that ground alone is called for. Moreover, we note that for eight months prior to the motion and for well over a year prior to the decision below, defendant was under an order of the district court to appoint counsel so that this case could proceed to trial. Without question, such cavalier disregard for a court order is a failure, under Rule 55(a), to "otherwise defend as provided by these rules." In addition, it is settled law that a corporation cannot appear other than by its attorney. See, e.g., Simbraw, Inc. v. United States, 367 F.2d 373 (3d Cir. 1966); Flora Construction Co. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 307 F.2d 413 (10th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 950, 83 S.Ct. 505, 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963). As plaintiffs requested, the district court should also have entered a default judgment on the issue of liability and appointed a special master to determine the amount of damages.

Judgment reversed and case remanded to the district court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.


Summaries of

Shapiro, Bernstein Co. v. Continental Record

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 28, 1967
386 F.2d 426 (2d Cir. 1967)

holding that a corporation cannot appear other than by its attorney

Summary of this case from Pecarsky v. Galaxiworld.com Ltd.

holding that defendant's failure to comply with court order to appoint counsel was a failure to defend under Rule 55, and a default judgment should be entered

Summary of this case from Menacho v. K Power Constr., Inc.

holding that a corporate defendant who originally appeared through counsel, who later withdrew, and who refused to obtain new counsel after the court ordered it to do so, had failed to “otherwise defend” such that an entry of default was justified

Summary of this case from Embassy of the Fed. Republic of Nigeria v. Ugwuonye

holding that a corporate defendant who filed an answer through attorney who later withdrew, and who failed to obey court order to appoint new counsel so case could proceed to trial, was in default for failure to ‘otherwise defend’

Summary of this case from Christa Construction, LLC v. Connelly Drywall, LLC

holding that district court should have entered default judgment as to liability where defendant, who had filed an answer, failed for eight months to retain counsel for a corporate defendant so that it could appear in federal court

Summary of this case from Dillard v. Victoria M. Morton Enterprises, Inc.

finding default judgment appropriate because the defendant corporation failed to defend under Rule 55 when it disregarded the court's order to retain substitute counsel, which explained defendant could not proceed without an attorney

Summary of this case from Brittney Gobble Photography, LLC v. Wenn Ltd.

finding default judgment appropriate because the defendant corporation failed to defend under Rule 55 when it disregarded the court's order to retain substitute counsel, which explained defendant could not proceed without an attorney

Summary of this case from Hoskins Oil Co. v. Equilon Enters., LLC

reversing district court's refusal to grant Rule 55 default judgment where corporate defendant had not complied for one year with district court's order to secure new counsel after withdrawal of original counsel

Summary of this case from Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson Co., Inc.

reversing district court's refusal to grant a default judgment where corporate defendant had not complied for one year with district court's order to secure new counsel after withdrawal of its original counsel

Summary of this case from Dow Chemical Pacific v. Rascator Maritime S.A

reversing order that allowed action to proceed against a defendant corporation pro se

Summary of this case from Jones v. Niagara Frontier Transp. Authority

reversing order that allowed action to proceed against a pro se defendant corporation

Summary of this case from Mattel, Inc. v. Betterlover

reversing and remanding to district court for entry of default judgment against corporation not represented by duly admitted counsel

Summary of this case from Grenawalt v. AT & T Mobility, LLC

reversing district court's refusal to grant default judgment where corporate defendant failed to comply with court order requiring appearance through counsel

Summary of this case from Grant v. West

reversing order that allowed action to proceed against a defendant corporation pro se

Summary of this case from Codapro Corp. v. Wilson

stating that "it is settled law that a corporation cannot appear other than by its attorney"

Summary of this case from Diaz v. KC Plumbing, LLC

stating that "it is settled law that a corporation cannot appear other than by its attorney"

Summary of this case from J & J Sports Prods. v. Gazzah

stating that "it is settled law that a corporation cannot appear other than by its attorney"

Summary of this case from Godwin v. Buka N.Y. Corp.

stating that "it is settled law that a corporation cannot appear other than by its attorney"

Summary of this case from Trs. of Pavers & Rd. Builders Dist. Council Welfare, Pension, Annuity & Apprenticeship, Skill Improvment & Safety Funds v. Genrus Corp.

stating that "it is settled law that a corporation cannot appear other than by its attorney"

Summary of this case from Consol. Distribs., Inc. v. Mortner

stating that "it is settled law that a corporation cannot appear other than by its attorney"

Summary of this case from Saucedo v. On the Spot Audio Corp.

stating that "it is settled law that a corporation cannot appear other than by its attorney"

Summary of this case from Allen v. Don Diva Mag-Ent

stating that "it is settled law that a corporation cannot appear other than by its attorney"

Summary of this case from Garcia v. Chirping Chicken Nyc, Inc.

stating that "it is settled law that a corporation cannot appear other than by its attorney"

Summary of this case from Trs. of the 1199 SEIU Health Care Emps. Pension Fund v. Traymore Chemists, Inc.

stating that “it is settled law that a corporation cannot appear other than by its attorney”

Summary of this case from Finkel v. Universal Elec. Corp.

stating that "it is settled law that a corporation cannot appear other than by its attorney"

Summary of this case from Study Logic, LLC v. Clear Net Plus, Inc.
Case details for

Shapiro, Bernstein Co. v. Continental Record

Case Details

Full title:SHAPIRO, BERNSTEIN CO., Inc., Bourne, Inc., Leeds Music Corporation…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Nov 28, 1967

Citations

386 F.2d 426 (2d Cir. 1967)

Citing Cases

Viada v. Osaka Health Spa, Inc.

Moreover, the plaintiffs note that a corporate entity cannot appear in an action pro se; it can conduct…

VIADA v. OSAKA HEALTH SPA

Moreover, the plaintiffs note that a corporate entity cannot appear in an action pro se; it can conduct…