Sethy v. Alameda County Water Dist

2 Citing briefs

  1. L.A. Taxi Cooperative, Inc. et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

    RESPONSE to

    Filed July 2, 2015

    Accordingly, there is no way in which “binding precedent” will be set on these issues. Sethy v. Alameda Cnty. Water Dist., 545 F.2d 1157, 1160 (9th Cir. 1976) (“[P]rior decision is not binding precedent on point not raised in briefs or argument nor discussed in the opinion of the Court in that case.”) (citing United States v. L.A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc., 344 U.S. 33, 37-38 (1952)).

  2. Conitz v. Teck Cominco Alaska Inc.

    RESPONSE in Opposition re MOTION for Attorney Fees Opposition to Teck's Motion for Attorney's Fees

    Filed September 5, 2008

    See also 42 USC 2000e-2(a)(1)(2000). National origin discrimination is defined broadly, Sethy v. Alameda County Water District, 545 F.2d 1157, 1159 (9th Cir. 1976). Conitz clearly comes from European descent and is a different race and/or national origin than an Alaska Native.