Summary
holding supervisory liability under Section 1983 cannot be premised on respondeat superior
Summary of this case from Smart v. WilsonOpinion
No. 93-1885.
October 3, 1994.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 17 F. 3d 295.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Sessions Tank Liners, Inc. v. Joor Manufacturing, Inc.
U.S.
Oct 3, 1994
513 U.S. 813 (1994)
Summaries of
Sessions Tank Liners, Inc. v. Joor Manufacturing, Inc.
U.S.
Oct 3, 1994
513 U.S. 813 (1994)
holding supervisory liability under Section 1983 cannot be premised on respondeat superior
Summary of this case from Smart v. Wilsonholding a plaintiff must show deliberate indifference of supervisor
Summary of this case from Cooper v. Atkinsfinding that “[w]e do not have to resolve this issue here”
Summary of this case from McNaught v. Va. Cmty. Coll. Sys.summarizing the position of this set of circuits but not taking a position itself
Summary of this case from McNaught v. Va. Cmty. Coll. Sys.discussing supervisory liability
Summary of this case from Powell v. Kellernoting among three requirements that plaintiff must allege and prove that supervisor had "actual or constructive knowledge" of subordinate's wrongful conduct
Summary of this case from David Gregory Camp v. BulldogCase details for
Sessions Tank Liners, Inc. v. Joor Manufacturing, Inc.
Case Details
Full title:SESSIONS TANK LINERS, INC. v. JOOR MANUFACTURING, INC
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 3, 1994
Citations
513 U.S. 813 (1994)
Citing Cases
Poe v. Leonard
We conclude that Poe must show that both laws were clearly established to lay the predicate for demonstrating…
McNaught v. Va. Cmty. Coll. Sys.These courts require this enhanced showing because they argue that a reverse discrimination plaintiff “who…