Scott
v.
Harrigan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKMar 4, 2016
9:13-CV-1368 (DNH/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 2016)

9:13-CV-1368 (DNH/DEP)

03-04-2016

LEE SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. MS. TANIE HARRIGAN, Defendant.

APPEARANCES: LEE SCOTT Plaintiff, Pro Se 54 Glen Ave. 2nd Floor Mt. Vernon, NY 10550 HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN Attorney General for the State of New York Attorneys for Defendant 615 Erie Blvd. West, Ste. 102 Syracuse, NY 13204 OF COUNSEL: KEVIN M. HAYDEN, ESQ. Ass't Attorney General


APPEARANCES: LEE SCOTT
Plaintiff, Pro Se
54 Glen Ave.
2nd Floor
Mt. Vernon, NY 10550 HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN
Attorney General for the State of New York
Attorneys for Defendant
615 Erie Blvd. West, Ste. 102
Syracuse, NY 13204 OF COUNSEL: KEVIN M. HAYDEN, ESQ.
Ass't Attorney General DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER

Pro se plaintiff Lee Scott brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 10, 2016, the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that defendant's motion for summary judgment be granted, and the complaint be dismissed in its entirety. See ECF No. 24. Neither party timely filed objections.

Based upon a de novo review of the Report-Recommendation, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Therefore, it is ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and the complaint is DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY; and

2. The Clerk serve a copy of this Decision and Order upon plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules.

The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________


United States District Judge Dated: March 4, 2016


Utica, New York