Schleyer
v.
Comm'r of Internal Revenue (In re Estate of Haggart)

Tax Court of the United States.Jul 7, 1949
13 T.C. 14 (U.S.T.C. 1949)
13 T.C. 14T.C.

Docket No. 19667.

1949-07-7

ESTATE OF ELIZABETH W. HAGGART, DECEASED, KATHRYN C. SCHLEYER AND GIRARD TRUST COMPANY, EXECUTORS, PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

F. G. Spencer, Esq., and Howard C. Cummings, Esq., for the petitioners. John A. Newton, Esq., for the respondent.


In determining the value of a revocable trust includible in the gross estate for estate tax purposes under section 811(c), I.R.C., held, attorney fees and other miscellaneous expenses attributable to the administration of the trust which were not shown to be liabilities at death of decedent are not proper reductions; held, further, none of the above items are deductible from the gross as administration expenses of the estate under section 812(b), I.R.C. F. G. Spencer, Esq., and Howard C. Cummings, Esq., for the petitioners. John A. Newton, Esq., for the respondent.

This case involves a deficiency in estate tax in the amount of $4,543.98. The question presented is whether certain legal and other expenses allowed by the orphans' court at the accounting of the decedent's inter vivos trust are recognizable for estate tax purposes as either a charge on the assets of that trust or a deduction from the gross estate. Other questions involved in the Commissioner's determination have been settled between the parties.

FINDINGS OF FACT.

All facts are stipulated and the stipulation is adopted as submitted.

Elizabeth W. Haggart died August 20, 1946, domiciled in Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania. Kathryn G. Schleyer and the Girard Trust Co. are executors under her will.

On April 17, 1946, decedent transferred property of an approximate value of $328,400.77 to the Girard Trust Co. as trustee under a revocable deed of trust. Its relevant provisions were: The trust income was reserved to the settlor for life; if the settlor's individual estate should be insufficient to pay debts and administrative expenses in connection with the settlement of her estate, the trustees were authorized to pay these expenses out of the corpus of the trust; that at the death of the settlor the trustees should pay specific amounts to various named individuals; that the residue should continue in trust, with the net income thereof to be paid to three named nieces and nephews until the death of the last survivor of them; and upon the death of the last survivor of her nieces and nephews, the trust principal was to be paid per capita to settlor's grandnieces and grandnephews. The settlor provided that on her death her niece, Kathryn G. Schleyer, who was also one of her executors, should be appointed cotrustee to act with the Girard Trust Co.

Also on April 17, 1946, decedent executed her last will and testament, providing therein that the residue of her testamentary estate, after stipulated distributions, should be paid over the trustees named in the trust deed mentioned above and be distributed by the trustees according to the terms of the deed of trust. She directed that all estate taxes, inheritance taxes, succession taxes, or taxes in the nature thereof under ‘this my will and any codicil thereof‘ should be paid out of the principal of ‘my general estate.‘ Kathryn G. Schleyer and the Girard Trust Co. were named executors.

Separate accounts of the inter vivos trust and the decedent's estate were filed in the Orphans' Court of Philadelphia County on April 30, 1947. The account filed for the trust listed, among others, the following deductions.

+-----------------------------------------------------+ ¦Notary fee ¦$0.50 ¦ +-------------------------------------------+---------¦ ¦Attorney fee ¦5,000.00 ¦ +-------------------------------------------+---------¦ ¦Commissions ¦9,170.48 ¦ +-------------------------------------------+---------¦ ¦Filing, advertising, and adjudication costs¦125.00 ¦ +-------------------------------------------+---------¦ ¦Total ¦14,295.98¦ +-----------------------------------------------------+

The orphans' court on June 16, 1947, adjudicated the account of the trust, and in so doing it recited that ‘there was no objection to the account,‘ which was approved as filed.

On June 23, 1947, the same court rendered an adjudication of the account of the personal estate of the decedent and in the order stated that there was no objection to the account, and stated that payment of transfer inheritance tax, $17,100 on November 21, 1946, was duly vouched. The balance of the estate, principal and income, was therein stated to be $14,607.46.

On November 17, 1947, an estate tax return was filed with the collector of internal revenue for the first district of Pennsylvania, at Philadelphia. In schedule ‘G‘ of the return, captioned ‘Transfers during decedent's life.‘ the value of the assets of the trust were stated to be $328,400.77, and the following deductions aggregating $14,295.98 were claimed in arriving at the value of the trust assets includible in the gross estate:

+----------------------------------------------------+ ¦Attorney fee ¦$5,000.00¦ +------------------------------------------+---------¦ ¦Commissions ¦9,170.48 ¦ +------------------------------------------+---------¦ ¦Notary ¦.50 ¦ +------------------------------------------+---------¦ ¦Filing, advertising and adjudication costs¦125.00 ¦ +------------------------------------------+---------¦ ¦Total ¦14,295.98¦ +----------------------------------------------------+

On August 20, 1948, the executors filed a transfer inheritance tax affidavit with the Register of Wills of Philadelphia County. The affidavit, in schedule C thereof, listed the value of the assets of the trust at $328,400.77, claimed the same deductions as were claimed in the estate tax return, except that the notary fee of 50 cents was omitted in the amount of $14,295.48, leaving a net balance of $314,105.29. Assets of the personal estate of the decedent were shown therein to be $40,563.53, less deductions of $7,329.44, or a net balance of $33,334.17. The net total value of personal and trust estates, as shown in the transfer inheritance tax affidavit, was $347,339.38.

On the same date, August 20, 1948, the register of wills filed his appraisement, in which the assets of the trust were listed at $314,105.29, the personal estate at $40,563.53, deductions at $7,329.44, and net estate subject to tax at $347,339.38. Bill was rendered in accordance with this appraisement and was duly paid.

On May 13, 1948, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue determined a deficiency of $4,543.98 in estate tax. The deficiency resulted principally from an increased valuation of real estate, disallowance of attorney fees and filing, advertising, etc., expenses involved in the inter vivos trust, together with a reduction of executors' commissions.

The deficiency notice, in explaining the disallowed deductions which are at issue before us, reads as follows:

The deductions claimed for attorneys' fees and expenses have been disallowed because they are not charges against the estate that are deductible for estate tax purposes.

Petitioner alleges that the Commissioner erred in disallowing the deductions claimed for the $5,000 attorney fee, the 50-cent notary fee, and the $125 for filing, advertising, and adjudication costs.

OPINION.

HARLAN, Judge:

It is the contention of the respondent that expenses incurred by the trustees of a revocable trust, the assets of which on the death of the settlor are, under the provisions of section 811(c) of the Internal Revenue Code, taxable in the estate of the settlor, can not be considered either a charge on the assets of the trust estate or a deduction from the gross estate for the purposes of taxation unless they were definitely incurred by the trust estate prior to the death of the settlor.

SEC. 811. GROSS ESTATE.The value of the gross estate of the decedent shall be determined by including the value at the time of his death of all property, real or personal, tangible or intangible, wherever situated, except real property situated outside of the United States—(c) TRANSFERS IN CONTEMPLATION OF, OR TAKING EFFECT AT DEATH.— To the extent of any interest therein of which the decedent has at any time made a transfer, by trust or otherwise, in contemplation of or intended to take effect in possession or enjoyment at or after his death, or of which he has at any time made a transfer, by trust or otherwise, under which he has retained for his life or for any period not ascertainable without reference to his death or for any period which does not in fact end before his death (1) the possession or enjoyment of, or the right to the income from, the property, or (2) the right, either alone or in conjunction with any person, to designate the persons who shall possess or enjoy the property or the income therefrom * * *.

It is petitioners' contention that the fees and other administrative expenses of the trust are proper charges against the corpus of the trust under section 812(b) of the code.

SEC. 812. NET ESTATE.For the purpose of the tax the value of the net estate shall be determined, in the case of a citizen or resident of the United States by deducting from the value of the gross estate—(b) EXPENSES, LOSSES, INDEBTEDNESS, AND TAXES.— Such amounts—(1) for funeral expenses,(2) for administration expenses,(3) for claims against the estate,(4) for unpaid mortgages upon, or any indebtedness in respect to, property where the value of decedent's interest therein undiminished by such mortgage or indebtedness, is included in the value of the gross estate, and(5) reasonably required and actually expended for the support during the settlement of the estate of those dependent upon the decedent.as are allowed by the laws of the jurisdiction, whether within or without the United States * * *.

From an examination of the two quoted sections of the Internal Revenue Code it becomes evident that, while administration expenses are specifically listed as deductible in computing the value of the net estate, there is no provision in the code for deducting the operating expenses of a trust, even though the value of the assets of the trust estate are includible in computing the value of the gross estate. The petitioners, however, argue strongly against the reasonableness of such a distinction and cite Elroy N. Clark et al., Trustees, 1 T.C. 663. In that case the deed of trust provided that at the death of the trustor's wife and beneficiary the trust should terminate and the assets thereof be distributed. The trustees incurred some attorneys' fees prior to and during their accounting after the death of the trustor's wife and the Commissioner had disallowed these fees as deductions in computing the value of the wife's taxable estate. Holding that the Commissioner erred in so doing, this Court said:

* * * These (fees) being for service in connection with trustees' accountings, in our opinion they were, like the trustees' commissions, necessary charges against the estate at the date of the death. Estate of Frederic E. Baldwin, 44 B.T.A. 900, relied on by the respondent, involved attorneys' fees for controversies arising after the death; here the trustees must necessarily file accounting, in order to pass the estate. The deduction of the attorneys' fees from gross estate is allowed.

However, the all-important distinction between the Clark case and the instant proceeding is that in the former the winding up of the trust was a necessary act in the administration of the estate, as the trust terminated at the death of the trustor's wife. In the case at bar the trust continued indefinitely after the close of decedent's estate and the attorney fees, together with the filing, advertising, adjudication, and notary fees attendant upon the trust accounting were simply operating costs of the trust. They were approved by the Orphans' Court of Philadelphia County in the accounting filed for the trust as proper expenditures of the trust, and not in the accounting filed for the estate of the decedent as administration expenses of the estate. They were incurred in executing the directions of the settlor as set forth in the trust instrument. Moreover, we do not agree with petitioners that the provision contained in the trust instrument that, if the decedent-settlor's net estate should not prove to be sufficient to meet administrative expenses and taxes, the trustee should pay debts and administrative expenses out of the corpus of the trust, is justification for treating expenses of the trust as administration expenses of the estate.

A situation very similar to that here under consideration was presented in the Estate of Cora C. Reynolds, 45 B.T.A. 44, and the Board in its opinion in that proceeding said:

The final question is whether fees and expenses of a proceeding to account for another trust may be deducted either as a charge against the estate or as an expense of administration. On the former ground, they are precluded since the proceeding followed decedent's death, and compliance with the requirement that the debt exist at the date of death consequently fails. And they must also be disallowed as an administration expense. Estate of Frederic E. Baldwin, 44 B.T.A. 900.

A similar conclusion was reached by this Court in Estate of Rose M. Harter, 3 T.C. 1151.

It is to be noted that at no place in the record is there any evidence that the trust estate had incurred any liability for the attorneys' fees or other disallowed expense items prior to the death of the trustor and it is also to be noted that the Commissioner herein allowed the deduction of $9,170.48 as commissions, apparently because of the fact that those commissions were earned by the trustee prior to the trustor's death. Estate of George S. Fiske, 45 B.T.A. 52; affd., 132 FED.(2D) 644.

On brief, petitioners point to the similarity of the provisions of the Pennsylvania State Transfer Inheritance Tax Act and the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code with respect to the taxation of transfers to take effect in possession or enjoyment at or after death and the allowance of deductions for expenses of administration, and urge that, inasmuch as the expenses in question were allowed as deductions for state inheritance tax purposes, they should have been allowed by the Commissioner for Federal estate tax purposes. This argument is not persuasive, as allowances made by a state for inheritance tax purposes have no logical binding effect upon the allowance of the same expenses for Federal estate tax purposes.

The respondent did not err in his determination that the value of the trust property includible in the gross estate of decedent may not be reduced by attorney fees and other expenses attributable to the administration of the trust.

Reviewed by the Court.

Decision will be entered under Rule 50.