Royal Indem.v.Providence Washington

Not overruled or negatively treated on appealinfoCoverage
United States Court of Appeals, Second CircuitJan 8, 1999
172 F.3d 38 (2d Cir. 1999)

Cases citing this case

How cited

  • Valenti v. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co.

    …Embezzling from an ERISA plan thus constitutes racketeering, and is a predicate act upon which a civil RICO…

  • U.S. v. Agate

    …See U.S. v. Schwamborn, 468 F. Supp. 2d 425 (E.D.N.Y. 2007) (Glasser, J.) ("[Local] Rule 50.3(c) does not…

lock 42 Citing caseskeyboard_arrow_right

Summaries written by judges

Summaries

  • finding law firm was not discharged for cause

    Summary of this case from Antonmarchi v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York

  • noting that the preamble to the Local Rules provides that "[t]hese rules are adopted for the internal management of the case load of the court and shall not be deemed to vest any rights in litigants or their attorneys. . . ."

    Summary of this case from U.S. v. Agate

No. 97-7301.

January 8, 1999.

Appeal from the N.D.N.Y., 952 F.Supp. 125.


Affirmed.


An alternative to Lexis that does not break the bank.

Casetext does more than Lexis for less than $65 per month.