arguing that Chapman can be read to support either test but that a standard similar to the overwhelming evidence test seems to be more properSummary of this case from State v. Evans
No. 798, Misc.
Decided May 27, 1968.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Walter R. Jones, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, and Anderson v. Nelson, 390 U.S. 523.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.