From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. California

U.S.
May 27, 1968
391 U.S. 470 (1968)

Summary

arguing that Chapman can be read to support either test but that a standard similar to the overwhelming evidence test seems to be more proper

Summary of this case from State v. Evans

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.

No. 798, Misc.

Decided May 27, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 67 Cal.2d 64, 429 P.2d 606, reversed.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Walter R. Jones, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.


The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, and Anderson v. Nelson, 390 U.S. 523.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.


Summaries of

Ross v. California

U.S.
May 27, 1968
391 U.S. 470 (1968)

arguing that Chapman can be read to support either test but that a standard similar to the overwhelming evidence test seems to be more proper

Summary of this case from State v. Evans
Case details for

Ross v. California

Case Details

Full title:ROSS v . CALIFORNIA

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 27, 1968

Citations

391 U.S. 470 (1968)
88 S. Ct. 1850

Citing Cases

People v. Terry

(26) The applicable law is summarized in the case of People v. Ross, 67 Cal.2d 64, 69-70 [ 60 Cal.Rptr. 254,…

People v. Superior Court (Simon)

( People v. Ross (1967) 67 Cal.2d 64, 70 [ 60 Cal.Rptr. 254, 429 P.2d 606], revd. on other grounds subnom.…