From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. American Home Mortg. Servicing, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 19, 2012
CIV. NO. S-10-3250 FCD GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 2012)

Opinion

CIV. NO. S-10-3250 FCD GGH PS

04-19-2012

RONALD ROSE, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action, referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). Defendant American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc's motion for judgment on the pleadings is presently noticed for hearing on the April 26, 2012, law and motion calendar of the undersigned. Having reviewed the record, the court has determined that oral argument would not be of material assistance in determining the pending motion. Accordingly, the court will not entertain oral argument, and will determine the motion on the record, including the briefing in support of the pending motion. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The April 26, 2012 hearing on the motion for judgment on the pleadings, filed March 8, 2012, is vacated; and

2. The motion is submitted on the record.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Rose v. American Home Mortg. Servicing, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 19, 2012
CIV. NO. S-10-3250 FCD GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Rose v. American Home Mortg. Servicing, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD ROSE, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 19, 2012

Citations

CIV. NO. S-10-3250 FCD GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 2012)