From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romero v. Kirkland

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 3, 2006
No. CIV S-05-1245 DFL JFM PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-1245 DFL JFM PS.

August 3, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On March 27, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 27, 2006, are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Romero v. Kirkland

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 3, 2006
No. CIV S-05-1245 DFL JFM PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2006)
Case details for

Romero v. Kirkland

Case Details

Full title:ROGER D. ROMERO, MONIQUE ROMERO, Plaintiffs, v. RODNEY KIRKLAND and JUNE…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 3, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-05-1245 DFL JFM PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2006)