Rodriguezv.TCB Naples LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISIONOct 28, 2015
Case No: 2:15-cv-106-FtM-38MRM (M.D. Fla. Oct. 28, 2015)

Case No: 2:15-cv-106-FtM-38MRM

10-28-2015

MARIO ROSAS RODRIGUEZ, for himself and on behalf of those similarly situated Plaintiff, v. TCB NAPLES LLC, Defendant.


ORDER

Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court. --------

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando (Doc. #29) filed on October 26, 2015. Judge Mirando recommends granting the parties' Joint Motion to Approve Settlement Agreement and Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. #28) as a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The Parties do not object to the Report and Recommendation. This matter is ripe for the Court's review.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Williams v . Wainwright , 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v . Vaughn , 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v . Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994).

After independently examining the file and upon considering Judge Mirando's findings and recommendations, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation(Doc. #29).

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando approving the Settlement Agreement of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) claim (Doc. #29) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED.

1. The parties' Joint Motion to Approve Settlement Agreement and Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. #28) is GRANTED, and the Settlement Agreement is approved as fair and reasonable.

2. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly, dismiss the case with prejudice, terminate all deadlines and motions, and close the file.

DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 28th day of October, 2015.

/s/ _________


SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies: All Parties of Record