Roberts
v.
State

Not overruled or negatively treated on appealinfoCoverage
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.Apr 28, 2015
480 S.W.3d 387 (E.D. Mo. 2015)

No. ED 101447

04-28-2015

Joey Roberts, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Amy M. Bartholow, 1000 W. Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, for appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Andrew C. Hooper, Asst. Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102–0899, for respondent.


Amy M. Bartholow, 1000 W. Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, for appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, Andrew C. Hooper, Asst. Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102–0899, for respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joey Roberts appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We find the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).