From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rivera v. Lutheran Medical Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 11, 2010
73 A.D.3d 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2008-11519.

May 11, 2010.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for employment discrimination in violation of the New York State Human Rights Law, the nonparty Morgan, Lewis Bockius, LLP, appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ambrosio, J.), dated October 16, 2008, as, upon determining that it violated former Code of Professional Responsibility DR 2-103 (a) (1) ( 22 NYCRR 1200.8 [a] [1]), now Rules of Professional Conduct ( 22 NYCRR 1200.0) rule 7.3, granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to disqualify it from representing certain witnesses in this action.

Morgan, Lewis Bockius, LLP, nonparty-appellant.

Morgan, Lewis Bockius, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Michael A. Bloom [pro hac vice], Kevin T. Rover, Debra Morway, and Amanda N. Slatin of counsel), nonparty-appellant pro se.

Alan J. Rich, LLC, Brooklyn, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: Skelos, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Chambers, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the contention of the nonparty appellant, the record supports the Supreme Court's determination that it engaged in acts of solicitation of professional employment, in violation of former Code of Professional Responsibility DR 2-103 (a) (1) ( 22 NYCRR 1200.8 [a] [1]), now Rules of Professional Conduct ( 22 NYCRR 1200.0) rule 7.3. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to disqualify the nonparty appellant from representing certain witnesses in this action.

The nonparty appellant's remaining contention regarding the plaintiffs standing is without merit ( see Maxon v Woods Oviatt Gilman LLP, 45 AD3d 1376, 1377; Vegetable Kingdom, Inc. v Katzen, 653 F Supp 917, 923 n 4 [1987]).

[Prior Case History: 22 Misc 3d 178.]


Summaries of

Rivera v. Lutheran Medical Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 11, 2010
73 A.D.3d 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Rivera v. Lutheran Medical Center

Case Details

Full title:FELIX RIVERA, Respondent, v. LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 11, 2010

Citations

73 A.D.3d 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 4168
899 N.Y.S.2d 859

Citing Cases

Soares v. State

he Appellate Division's authority over attorney discipline continued to be recognized as exclusive as a…

In the Matter of Richard A. Brown v. Blumenfeld

g ethical rules, Justice Blumenfeld would not purport to be determining an application for discipline of…