From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rios-Ramirez v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 5, 1967
386 F.2d 831 (9th Cir. 1967)

Opinion

No. 21540.

December 5, 1967.

Charles M. Berg, Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellant.

Wm. Matthew Byrne, Jr., U.S. Atty., Robert L. Brozio, Asst. U.S. Atty., Ronald S. Morrow (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, District Judge.

Hon. Gus J. Solomon, Chief Judge, United States District Court, Portland, Oregon, sitting by designation.


Appellant was convicted on each count of a two count indictment charging possession and sale of heroin "of wholesale character." Equal concurrent sentences were delivered. On appeal, appointed counsel ably raises five points.

1. The claimed insufficiency of the evidence is without merit — there was evidence the appellant had possession of the heroin and received the money for its sale.

2. Appellant denied both receipt or concealment of the heroin, and its sale. Under the holding of Ortiz v. United States, 358 F.2d 107, 108 (9th Cir. 1966), the defense of entrapment was not available. Further, appellant's counsel below neither requested any instructions on entrapment (C.T. 48-50), nor did he object to the instructions that were given (R.T. 742).

3. Other points urged, asking us to overrule previous holdings or to follow state court rulings, are unconvincing and without merit.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.


Summaries of

Rios-Ramirez v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 5, 1967
386 F.2d 831 (9th Cir. 1967)
Case details for

Rios-Ramirez v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Jose RIOS-RAMIREZ, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 5, 1967

Citations

386 F.2d 831 (9th Cir. 1967)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. United States

There was no evidence to justify the issue of entrapment. Under these circumstances appellant was not…

United States v. Martinez

Martinez asks this court to recede from that view, asserting that some other circuits now allow an accused to…