From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rickey v. E. H. Jacobs Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jun 21, 1955
115 A.2d 336 (Conn. 1955)

Opinion

The plaintiff, while delivering some goods at the defendant's premises, cut his wrist on a pane of glass in the overhead door which he was opening. He had raised the door, but it started down and he put his hand on it. The hand slid into the glass in the upper part and went through one of the panes. Held: 1. Since there was no evidence of a defect in the door which caused it to come down, the defendant was not put on notice of a risk to invitees by reason of the lack of a screen over the glass. 2. The defendant was not guilty of a breach of its duty to the plaintiff, an invitee, to exercise reasonable care to have its premises safely constructed and maintained and to guard against subjecting him to dangers of which it was cognizant or which it might reasonably have anticipated.

Argued June 9, 1955

Decided June 21, 1955

Action to recover damages for personal injuries, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant, brought to the Superior Court in Windham County and tried to the jury before Troland, J.; verdict and judgment for the plaintiff and appeal by the defendant. Error; judgment directed.

The appellee filed a motion for reargument which was denied.

Ralph C. Dixon, with whom was C. Duane Blinn, for the appellant (defendant).

Charles V. James, for the appellee (plaintiff).


The only evidence on liability was the testimony of the plaintiff. The defendant, without submitting evidence, made a motion for a directed verdict which the court denied. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, and the defendant moved that it be set aside. It also moved for judgment in accordance with its motion for a directed verdict. Practice Book 234. The court denied these motions and the defendant has appealed from this action and from the judgment on the verdict. In this situation it was unnecessary to appeal both from the denial of the motions and from the judgment, as an appeal from the latter includes any error in the court's action on the motions. Practice Book 377; Lengel v. New Haven Gas Light Co., 142 Conn. 70, 73, 111 A.2d 547.

On February 19, 1947, the plaintiff, as a driver for an agent of a railway express company, was engaged in the delivery by truck of certain articles consigned to the defendant at its premises in Danielson. He gained access to the defendant's receiving room by a side entrance and proceeded to open from the inside a big front door through which he intended to deliver the goods. The door was an overhead one and was opened by grasping a handle and pushing the door up. It was metal or wood for three or four feet from the bottom. Above the solid portion were small panes of glass in sections.

The jury could reasonably have found these further facts: The plaintiff grasped the handle, pushed the door up and "figured it was up." He put it up as far as possible. It started down. He heard and saw it and put his hand on the solid part but the door kept coming down and his hand slid into the glass, breaking one of the panes. His wrist was cut.

The plaintiff was an invitee, and the defendant could be held liable only if it failed to exercise reasonable care to have its premises safely constructed and maintained and to guard against subjecting the plaintiff to dangers of which it was cognizant or which it might reasonably have anticipated. Smith v. Union New Haven Trust Co., 121 Conn. 369, 371, 185 A. 81. There was no evidence that the door was not properly balanced or that it was otherwise defective so that it would close after being pushed up. The plaintiff admitted that the door might come down if it were put back too far or not far enough. When the door came down, it set in motion a train of circumstances which resulted in the plaintiff's hand going through the glass. Since there was no evidence of a defect in the door which caused it to come down, the defendant was not put on notice of a risk to invitees by reason of the lack of a screen over the glass in the door. It was not guilty of any breach of its duty to the plaintiff as defined above. The court should have granted the defendant's motions.


Summaries of

Rickey v. E. H. Jacobs Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jun 21, 1955
115 A.2d 336 (Conn. 1955)
Case details for

Rickey v. E. H. Jacobs Mfg. Co.

Case Details

Full title:LEODORE A. RICKEY v. E. H. JACOBS MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jun 21, 1955

Citations

115 A.2d 336 (Conn. 1955)
115 A.2d 336

Citing Cases

State v. Davis

In the circumstances of this case, it was unnecessary to appeal both from a denial of the motion and from the…

Senderoff v. Housatonic Public Service Co.

The defendant then moved to have the verdict set aside and also to have judgment entered in its favor in…