From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Resure v. Chemical Distr

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 8, 1997
114 F.3d 1184 (5th Cir. 1997)

Summary

holding that municipal prosecutors are entitled to absolute prosecutorial immunity from § 1983 damage claims

Summary of this case from Thomas v. State

Opinion

No. 96-30773

May 8, 1997.

Appeal from the M.D.La., 927 F.Supp. 190


Affirmed.


Summaries of

Resure v. Chemical Distr

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 8, 1997
114 F.3d 1184 (5th Cir. 1997)

holding that municipal prosecutors are entitled to absolute prosecutorial immunity from § 1983 damage claims

Summary of this case from Thomas v. State

In Mauldin v. Fiesta Mart, 114 F.3d 1184, 1997 WL 255640, at **1, 2 (5th Cir. May 7, 1997) (unpublished), the Fifth Circuit upheld the district court's refusal to grant the plaintiff additional discovery after the defendant had already filed its summary judgment motion, concluding that the new and dramatically broader discovery sought was a dilatory tactic "calculated to uncover something upon which to rest the otherwise unsupported allegations in his complaint.

Summary of this case from Shanklin v. Columbia Management Advisors, L.L.C.
Case details for

Resure v. Chemical Distr

Case Details

Full title:Resure, Inc. v. Chemical Distr., Inc

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: May 8, 1997

Citations

114 F.3d 1184 (5th Cir. 1997)

Citing Cases

Luera v. Kleberg County, Texas

In addition, Plaintiff "may not invoke Rule 56(f) by the mere assertion that discovery is not yet complete,…

Wright v. Freeport Hudson Anglers, Inc.

Offshore Logistics, Inc. v Tallentine. 477 US 207, 216 (1986). An issue of fact exists as to where the…