Opinion
No. C-08-5561 BZ(EMC)
01-23-2012
STEPHEN THOMAS DAVENPORT, JR. Attorneys for Defendants M&M Installation, Inc., Mark Simas, Ken Simas, Jack Simas, Dave Simas, Craig Simas and Michclo Simas Carli, and and Defendant/Counter- Claimant Simas Floor Company, Inc. KRAW & KRAW KATUERINE, McDONOUGH Attorneys for Plainliffs Resilient Floor Covering Pension Fund and Board of Trustees of the Resilient Floor Covering Pension Fund
STEPHEN THOMAS DAVENPORT, JR. #88208
JEFFREY G. McCLURE #152974
DAVENPORT GERSTMER & McCLURE
Attorneys for Defendants and Defendant/Counter-Claimant
STIPULATION IN SUPPORT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR INCREASED PAGE LIMIT FOR
DEFENDANTS' AND COUNTER-CLAIMANT'S REPLY BRIEF ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
ORDER THEREON (proposed)
(Local Rule 7-11)
Defendants M&M Installation, Inc., Mark Simas, Ken Simas, Jack Simas, Dave Simas, Craig Simas and Michele Simas Carli and Defcndant/Countcr-Claimant Simas Floor Company, Inc. (collectively, "Defendants") and Plaintiffs Resilient Floor Covering Pension Fund and Board of Trustees of the Resilient Floor Covering Pension Fund ("Plaintiffs"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
The parties jointly request that the Court increase the page limit for Defendants' Reply Brief on the parties' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment to 20 pages. This request for increased page limits is made due to the complexity and novelty of the issues addressed by the parties' Cross-Motions and in Defendants' Reply Brief.
DAVENPORT GERSTNER & McCLURE
____________
STEPHEN THOMAS DAVENPORT, JR.
Attorneys for Defendants M&M Installation, Inc., Mark
Simas, Ken Simas, Jack Simas, Dave Simas, Craig Simas
and Michclo Simas Carli, and and Defendant/Counter
Claimant Simas Floor Company, Inc.
KRAW & KRAW
KATUERINE, McDONOUGH
Attorneys for Plainliffs Resilient Floor Covering Pension
Fund and Board of Trustees of the Resilient Floor Covering
Pension Fund
ORDER
GOOD CAUSE appearing, the Court grants Defendants' and Counter-Claimant's Administrative Motion as follows:
I. The page limits for Defendants' and Counter-Claimant's Reply Rrief on the parties' Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment shall lie increased to 20 pages. IT IS SO ORDERED.
____________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE