From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Peterson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 6, 2006
No. CIV S-04-1822 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-1822 LKK DAD P.

July 6, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On April 27, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 27, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed with prejudice due to plaintiff's failure to state a cognizable claim.


Summaries of

Reed v. Peterson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 6, 2006
No. CIV S-04-1822 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2006)
Case details for

Reed v. Peterson

Case Details

Full title:ALONZO REED, Plaintiff, v. S. PETERSON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 6, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-04-1822 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2006)