From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Harrisons

U.S.
Oct 19, 1953
346 U.S. 854 (1953)

Summary

affirming district court's denial of petition to stay arbitration, we assumed, arguendo, that six-year statute of limitations would bar the plaintiff's action, but nevertheless held that it was the role of the arbitrators to determine its effect

Summary of this case from Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. v. Wagoner

Opinion

No. 226.

October 19, 1953, OCTOBER TERM, 1953.


C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Acting Solicitor General Davis for petitioner. Francis A. Brick, Jr. and Burr F. Coleman for respondent. Reported below: 204 F. 2d 366.


Summaries of

Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Harrisons

U.S.
Oct 19, 1953
346 U.S. 854 (1953)

affirming district court's denial of petition to stay arbitration, we assumed, arguendo, that six-year statute of limitations would bar the plaintiff's action, but nevertheless held that it was the role of the arbitrators to determine its effect

Summary of this case from Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. v. Wagoner
Case details for

Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Harrisons

Case Details

Full title:RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORP. v. HARRISONS CROSFIELD, LTD., BY FRED…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 19, 1953

Citations

346 U.S. 854 (1953)

Citing Cases

Necchi Sewing Machine Sales Corp. v. Carl

Even were I to assume that the broad arbitration clause here involved requires that the issue of waiver — in…

World Brilliance Corp. v. Bethlehem Steel Co.

By repeating the words "failure, neglect, or refusal" in the clauses, quoted above, providing for a judicial…