From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co.

U.S.
May 4, 1987
481 U.S. 1041 (1987)

Summary

rejecting de novo review, adhering to "clear error" for review of finding of similarity in trade dress infringement

Summary of this case from Wildlife Exp. Corp. v. Carol Wright Sales, Inc.

Opinion

No. 86-1472.

May 4, 1987, October TERM, 1986.


ORDER

C A. 6th Cir. Motion of Michigan Trial Lawyers Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 805 F. 2d 611.


Summaries of

Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co.

U.S.
May 4, 1987
481 U.S. 1041 (1987)

rejecting de novo review, adhering to "clear error" for review of finding of similarity in trade dress infringement

Summary of this case from Wildlife Exp. Corp. v. Carol Wright Sales, Inc.

implying that delay of less than two years would not constitute laches

Summary of this case from Big O Tires, Inc. v. Bigfoot 4 × 4, Inc.

implying that delay of less than two years would not constitute laches

Summary of this case from Big O Tires, Inc. v. Bigfoot 4X4, Inc.

agreeing that front pay may be an appropriate remedy when reinstatement is inappropriate

Summary of this case from Ogden v. Wax Works, Inc.
Case details for

Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co.

Case Details

Full title:RABIDUE v. OSCEOLA REFINING CO., A DIVISION OF TEXAS-AMERICAN…

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 4, 1987

Citations

481 U.S. 1041 (1987)

Citing Cases

Graefenhain v. Pabst Brewing Co.

The facts relevant to our disposition of the various issues are stated in the body of our opinion. Before…

U.S.E.E.O.C. v. Century Broadcasting Corp.

1. Standard of review The ADEA grants district courts the power to award to successful age discrimination…