From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Purdie v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 29, 2016
CASE NO. ED CV 15-2415-CJC (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2016)

Opinion

CASE NO. ED CV 15-2415-CJC (PJW)

12-29-2016

RICHARD ALVIN PURDIE, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the Report and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

Further, for the reasons stated in the Final Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). DATED: December 29, 2016.

/s/_________

CORMAC J. CARNEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Purdie v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 29, 2016
CASE NO. ED CV 15-2415-CJC (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2016)
Case details for

Purdie v. Madden

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD ALVIN PURDIE, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 29, 2016

Citations

CASE NO. ED CV 15-2415-CJC (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2016)