From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prune Bargaining Association v. Bergland

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 20, 1978
571 F.2d 1132 (9th Cir. 1978)

Summary

outlining administrative and judicial review procedures

Summary of this case from Berning v. Gooding

Opinion

No. 75-3046.

March 20, 1978.

Reginald Steer, of Pillsbury, Madison Sutro, San Francisco, Cal., Bruce I. Cornblum (argued), San Diego, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Alexis Panagakos (argued), of Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; William H. Orrick, Jr., Judge.

Before DUNIWAY, WRIGHT and SNEED, Circuit Judges.


The judgment appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Orrick in his Memorandum Opinion, Prune Bargaining Association v. Butz, N.D.Cal., 1975, 444 F. Supp. 785. We add only that the judge did, on motion for new trial, consider appellants' "Corrected Exhibit C." As to that exhibit, he said:

[S]o far as the newly discovered evidence goes, I think it's inconsequential, at best, the changes in the figures — and irrelevant at the least.

(R.T. 198.)

He was right.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Prune Bargaining Association v. Bergland

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 20, 1978
571 F.2d 1132 (9th Cir. 1978)

outlining administrative and judicial review procedures

Summary of this case from Berning v. Gooding
Case details for

Prune Bargaining Association v. Bergland

Case Details

Full title:PRUNE BARGAINING ASSOCIATION, A NON-PROFIT COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION, ET…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 20, 1978

Citations

571 F.2d 1132 (9th Cir. 1978)

Citing Cases

Berning v. Gooding

The allegation that defendants caused the establishment of the saleable percentages as agreed without notice…

United States v. Sunny Cove Citrus Ass'n

One of the primary objectives of the AMAA is to establish and maintain parity prices for farmers. Id. at 830;…