holding that the federal court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction under section 1132(e) for a suit brought by an ERISA plan
Summary of this case from Line Const. Ben. Fund v. Allied Elec. ContracNo. 83-10.
October 3, 1983.
C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 700 F. 2d 889.
holding that the federal court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction under section 1132(e) for a suit brought by an ERISA plan
Summary of this case from Line Const. Ben. Fund v. Allied Elec. Contracholding that civil standing list is exclusive
Summary of this case from Abels v. Titan Intern., Inc.upholding district court's denial of leave to amend, albeit under 28 U.S.C. § 1653 because the original plaintiff sought " not to remedy inadequate jurisdictional allegations, but rather to substitute a new action over which there is jurisdiction for one where it did not exist."
Summary of this case from Fox v. Board of Trustees of State University of New Yorkrejecting standing of plan itself
Summary of this case from Chemung Canal Trust Co. v. Sovran Bank/Marylandallowing evidence of crime committed four years prior to charged act
Summary of this case from U.S. v. MasseyFull title:PRESSROOM UNIONS-PRINTERS LEAGUE INCOME SECURITY FUND v. CONTINENTAL…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 3, 1983
In re Korean Air Lines Disaster of September 1, 1983, 664 F. Supp. 1463. Its opinion specifically considered…
United States v. CuchFurthermore, before such evidence is properly admitted it must tend to establish intent, knowledge motive or…