Pixion, Inc.
v.
Citrix Sys., Inc.

Not overruled or negatively treated on appealinfoCoverage
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitMar 19, 2013
2012-1636 (Fed. Cir. 2013)
2012-1636500 Fed. Appx. 954

2012-1636

03-19-2013

PIXION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., AND CITRIX ONLINE, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.

COLBY B. SPRINGER, Lewis and Roca, LLP, of Mountain View California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel was SHANE E. OLAFSON, of Phoenix, Arizona. BLAIR M. JACOBS, McDermott Will & Emery, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were SARAH CHAPIN COLUMBIA and LEIGH J. MARTINSON, of Boston, Massachusetts. Of counsel on the brief was TERRY W. AHEARN, of Menlo Park, California. Of counsel was BRYAN KEITH JAMES, of Menlo Park, California.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 09-CV-3496, Judge Susan Y. Illston.

JUDGMENT

COLBY B. SPRINGER, Lewis and Roca, LLP, of Mountain View California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel was SHANE E. OLAFSON, of Phoenix, Arizona.

BLAIR M. JACOBS, McDermott Will & Emery, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were SARAH CHAPIN COLUMBIA and LEIGH J. MARTINSON, of Boston, Massachusetts. Of counsel on the brief was TERRY W. AHEARN, of Menlo Park, California. Of counsel was BRYAN KEITH JAMES, of Menlo Park, California. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, AND DYK, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

_____________


Jan Horbaly


Clerk