From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petticrew v. Petticrew

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 24, 1954
117 N.E.2d 706 (Ohio 1954)

Opinion

No. 33831

Decided February 24, 1954.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Action by son against father for conversion — Resulting from father's action under son's power of attorney — Claimed misconduct of counsel — Statement that witness committed perjury — Court's refusal to declare mistrial not abuse of discretion, when — Jury admonished to disregard statement — Prejudice not disclosed by record — Evidence — Admissibility of summarized conclusions of expert witness — Summary drawn from 400 separate sources — Documents upon which predicated in evidence — Charge to jury — Applicability of two-issue rule.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Clark county.

Messrs. Corry, Durfey, Martin Browne, for appellee.

Messrs. Cole Cole, Mr. William E. Bailey and Messrs. Kusworm Kusworm, for appellant.


It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MIDDLETON, TAFT, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART and LAMNECK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Petticrew v. Petticrew

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 24, 1954
117 N.E.2d 706 (Ohio 1954)
Case details for

Petticrew v. Petticrew

Case Details

Full title:PETTICREW, JR., APPELLEE v. PETTICREW, SR., APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Feb 24, 1954

Citations

117 N.E.2d 706 (Ohio 1954)
117 N.E.2d 706

Citing Cases

Miami Investment Corp. v. Baker

The court failed to find fraud as charged, and resolved the issues of fact in favor of the plaintiff. The…

Land Development, Inc. v. Padgett

Considering the time that the buyers had been in possession and the amount of money they had paid prior to…