From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Certification

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 1, 2001
169 N.J. 610 (N.J. 2001)

Summary

finding that the prosecutor's comments during summation about defense counsel's role in distorting the facts, by themselves, were not "sufficiently egregious to deprive defendant of his right to a fair trial," where the judge immediately instructed the jury to ignore the comment about the alibi being "concocted" with defense counsel

Summary of this case from State v. Daniels

Opinion

2001


Summaries of

Petitions for Certification

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 1, 2001
169 N.J. 610 (N.J. 2001)

finding that the prosecutor's comments during summation about defense counsel's role in distorting the facts, by themselves, were not "sufficiently egregious to deprive defendant of his right to a fair trial," where the judge immediately instructed the jury to ignore the comment about the alibi being "concocted" with defense counsel

Summary of this case from State v. Daniels
Case details for

Petitions for Certification

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR CERTIFICATION

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jan 1, 2001

Citations

169 N.J. 610 (N.J. 2001)
782 A.2d 422

Citing Cases

Martindale v. Sandvik

We granted plaintiff's petition for certification. 169 N.J. 610 (2001).…

Wubshet v. Cal. Apartments

Judge Littlefield concluded that pursuant to N.J.S.A. 46:8-21.1 and our decision in Yi v. Re/Max Fortune…