Board of Parole

Not overruled or negatively treated on appealinfoCoverage
Oregon Court of AppealsDec 11, 1996
145 Or. App. 252 (Or. Ct. App. 1996)
145 Or. App. 252927 P.2d 1121

CA A90127 (Control), CA A90645 (Cases Consolidated)

Argued and submitted July 24, 1996.

Affirmed December 11, 1996.

Petition for Review from Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision.

Eric M. Cumfer, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Mary H. Williams, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Haselton, Judges.



Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision establishing conditions of post-prison supervision, including a declaration that petitioner is a predatory sex offender. ORS 181.585 to ORS 181.589.

Petitioner's arguments are resolved contrary to his position by our decisions in Schuch v. Board of parole, 139 Or. App. 327, 912 P.2d 403, rev den 324 Or. 78 (1996), and Gress v. Board of parole, 143 Or. App. 7, 924 P.2d 329, on recons 144 Or. App. 375, 927 P.2d 138 (1996).