From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peralta v. Am. Telephone and Telegraph Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 30, 2006
816 N.Y.S.2d 436 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

8630.

May 30, 2006.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.), entered July 1, 2005, which denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on her Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action and, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, denied defendants' cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the section 240 (1) claim, unanimously modified, on the law, plaintiff's motion granted on the issue of liability, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Jeffrey A. Berson, New York, for appellants-respondents.

Alexander J. Wulwick, New York, for respondent-appellant.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Marlow, Sullivan, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ., concur.


Defendant landowners' argument that plaintiff worker's injuries, including a lacerated thumb, were not proximately caused by a gravity-related force when her unsecured, 12-foot ladder moved, causing her to lose balance at a height of nine feet and to grab onto an overhead air-duct brace as she slipped down two rungs of the ladder, lacks merit ( see e.g. Montalvo v. J. Petrocelli Constr., Inc., 8 AD3d 173; Lacey v. Turner Constr. Co., 275 AD2d 734). Unrefuted evidence that the unsecured ladder moved, combined with evidence that no other safety devices were provided to plaintiff, warranted a finding that the owners were absolutely liable under Labor Law § 240 (1), notwithstanding claims of comparative negligence ( see Velasco v. Green-Wood Cemetery, 8 AD3d 88), or unsupported claims that plaintiff's conduct was the sole proximate cause of her injuries.


Summaries of

Peralta v. Am. Telephone and Telegraph Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 30, 2006
816 N.Y.S.2d 436 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Peralta v. Am. Telephone and Telegraph Co.

Case Details

Full title:CANDIDA PERALTA, Respondent-Appellant, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 30, 2006

Citations

816 N.Y.S.2d 436 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
816 N.Y.S.2d 436
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 4184

Citing Cases

Caswell v. Trustees of Columbia Univ.

Defendant has presented no eyewitness testimony disputing plaintiff's version of how the accident occurred.…

Martucci v. New York City Transit Auth.

evice, it must be sufficient to provide proper protection. It is well settled that [the] failure to properly…