From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Zangari

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Four
Jun 21, 2001
89 Cal.App.4th 1436 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001)

Summary

In Zangari, the reasonable inference of asportation arose not simply from the fact that restitution was ordered to be paid to an individual living at the burglarized premises, but also from the fact that the restitution amount was to be reduced if additional property was recovered in satisfactory condition.

Summary of this case from People v. Parker

Opinion

A091689

Filed June 21, 2001 REVIEW GRANTED



Summaries of

People v. Zangari

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Four
Jun 21, 2001
89 Cal.App.4th 1436 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001)

In Zangari, the reasonable inference of asportation arose not simply from the fact that restitution was ordered to be paid to an individual living at the burglarized premises, but also from the fact that the restitution amount was to be reduced if additional property was recovered in satisfactory condition.

Summary of this case from People v. Parker
Case details for

People v. Zangari

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NICHOLAS ROBERT ZANGARI…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Four

Date published: Jun 21, 2001

Citations

89 Cal.App.4th 1436 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001)
108 Cal. Rptr. 2d 250

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

In particular, defendant maintains that the mental state required for robbery in Oregon is something less…

People v. Parker

To qualify as a strike, a conviction in another jurisdiction must include all of the elements of the…