From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Vacante

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1995
215 A.D.2d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

May 1, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed.

At a pretrial hearing, a witness made reference to the audiotapes forming the basis of the defendant's present Rosario claim and the defense counsel made no request for them at that time or at the trial. Inasmuch as the defendant had knowledge of the existence of the subject Rosario material and failed to object at a time when any Rosario violation could have been redressed, the issue has not been preserved for appellate review (see, People v Jackson, 78 N.Y.2d 900, 901; People v Rivera, 78 N.Y.2d 901, 903; People v Rogelio, 79 N.Y.2d 843, 845; People v Toro, 168 A.D.2d 400, cf., People v Smith, 190 A.D.2d 700), and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Thompson, J.P., Santucci, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Vacante

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1995
215 A.D.2d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Vacante

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. VINCENT VACANTE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1995

Citations

215 A.D.2d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
626 N.Y.S.2d 960

Citing Cases

People v. Powell

The verdict is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence ( see, People v…

People v. Cleghorn

There are several cases that opine that when the prosecutor refuses to attend the preliminary hearing of a…