From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tabb

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 24, 2009
920 N.E.2d 90 (N.Y. 2009)

Summary

holding that an "absence of record proof constituted "a mode of proceedings error . . . requiring reversal"

Summary of this case from Munoz v. Burge

Opinion

No. 213 SSM 47.

Decided November 24, 2009.

APPEAL, by permission of an Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, entered February 6, 2009. The Appellate Division affirmed a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Penny M. Wolfgang, J.), which had convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of assault on a peace officer, police officer, fireman or emergency medical services professional and assault in the second degree.

People v. Tabb, 59 AD3d 1080, reversed.

Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo ( Robert B. Hallborg, Jr., David C. Schopp and Barbara J. Davies of counsel), for appellant.

Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney, Buffalo ( Raymond C. Herman of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES concur in memorandum.


OPINION OF THE COURT

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

During deliberations, the jury sent a note to the trial court that asked for direction on, or an explanation of, "the legal definition of self defense." Nothing in the record indicates that the court informed defense counsel and the prosecutor about the contents of the note. In the absence of record proof that the trial court complied with its core responsibilities under CPL 310.30, a mode of proceedings error occurred requiring reversal ( see e.g. People v. Kisoon, 8 NY3d 129, 135; People v. O'Rama, 78 NY2d 270, 277).

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals ( 22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

People v. Tabb

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 24, 2009
920 N.E.2d 90 (N.Y. 2009)

holding that an "absence of record proof constituted "a mode of proceedings error . . . requiring reversal"

Summary of this case from Munoz v. Burge

In People v. Tabb, 13 N.Y.3d 852, 853 (2009), the New York Court of Appeals held that, "[i]n the absence of record proof that the trial court complied with its core responsibilities under CPL 310.30, a mode of proceedings error occur[s] requiring reversal.

Summary of this case from Heron v. Griffin
Case details for

People v. Tabb

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHRISTIAN TABB,…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 24, 2009

Citations

920 N.E.2d 90 (N.Y. 2009)
920 N.E.2d 90
891 N.Y.S.2d 686
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 8679

Citing Cases

People v. Surpris

The opportunity to respond "is essential to counsel's ability to represent the client's best interests and,…

People v. Silva

The record therefore must indicate compliance with adequate procedures under O'Rama because reviewing courts…