From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Spells

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jul 26, 1972
42 Mich. App. 243 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972)

Opinion

Docket No. 13361.

Decided July 26, 1972.

Appeal from Oakland, Clark J. Adams, J. Submitted Division 2 June 20, 1972, at Lansing. (Docket No. 13361.) Decided July 26, 1972.

Benny Lee Spells was convicted of first-degree murder. Defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, Thomas G. Plunkett, Prosecuting Attorney, and Dennis Donohue, Chief Appellate Counsel, for the people.

William E. Bolle, for defendant on appeal.

Before: FITZGERALD, P.J., and QUINN and DANHOF, JJ.


Defendant was first convicted of murder in the first degree in July, 1962, allegedly having committed the murder in an attempt to commit an armed robbery. MCLA 750.316; MSA 28.548. The conviction was reversed by this Court. People v. Spells, 16 Mich. App. 609 (1969). In a second trial the jury again found the defendant guilty of the original charge and he was sentenced to a term of life imprisonment on February 4, 1970. On February 7, 1972, this Court granted defendant's application for delayed appeal.

Although framed in several different ways, the only substantial question involved in this case is whether the people had established the corpus delicti of the offense before offering the defendant's confession into evidence. Defendant contends that under the felony-murder statute, MCLA 750.316; MSA 28.548, the prosecution as part of the corpus delicti must establish the particular felony involved, i.e., armed robbery or attempted armed robbery. This precise question was before this Court in People v. Allen, 39 Mich. App. 483 (1972), and was answered contrary to the claim of the defendant. In Allen, the court relied on People v. Lytton, 257 N.Y. 310; 178 N.E. 290; 79 ALR 503 (1931). Additional authority is found in State v. Goyet, 120 Vt. 12, 132 A.2d 623 (1957); State v. Johnson, 31 N.J. 489; 158 A.2d 11 (1960); Jefferson v. State, 128 So.2d 132 (Fla, 1961); Reyes v. State, 155 So.2d 663 (Fla App, 1963).

While it is true that for most offenses there must be evidence of all of the elements of the offense without reference to the accused's confession, murder is treated differently. See People v. Randall, 42 Mich. App. 187 (1972). Of all the crimes known to our law only murder is divided into degrees. First-degree murder and second-degree murder are consistently treated as two divisions of the same crime, not as distinctly separate crimes. For example, an accused may be bound over on an open charge of murder and the information need not specify the degree. If murder is regarded as a single offense divided into degrees the corpus delicti is established by showing a death and a criminal agency as its cause, and the degree may be established by the defendant's statements. We recognize that there is a certain artificiality in this distinction; however, this is often the case with statutory distinctions and we think that we should give effect to the Legislature's intent. Once the crime of murder has been established the danger that a crime that has not been committed will be confessed is sufficiently averted. People v. Lytton, supra, People v. Cuozzo, 292 N.Y. 85; 54 N.E.2d 20 (1944); People v. Louis, 1 N.Y.2d 137; 151 N.Y.S.2d 20; 134 N.E.2d 110 (1956).

The remaining questions raised by the defendant were either not preserved in the trial court, or have not been briefed, and as such they will not be considered on appeal. People v. Williams, 29 Mich. App. 420 (1971); People v. Heard, 31 Mich. App. 439 (1971).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Spells

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jul 26, 1972
42 Mich. App. 243 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972)
Case details for

People v. Spells

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. SPELLS

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 26, 1972

Citations

42 Mich. App. 243 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972)
201 N.W.2d 361

Citing Cases

People v. Sparks

It has been said affirmatively that the corpus delicti is established by death and an unnatural cause of…

People v. Johnson

The most egregious aspect of this procedure is that when a defendant is bound over on a charge of open murder…