From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Roopchand

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 2, 1985
482 N.E.2d 924 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Decided July 2, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Nicholas Tsoucalas, J.

Robin J. Nichinsky and William E. Hellerstein for appellant.

John J. Santucci, District Attorney ( Jeanette Lifschitz of counsel), for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed for the reasons stated in the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division ( 107 A.D.2d 35).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER. Taking no part: Judge TITONE.


Summaries of

People v. Roopchand

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 2, 1985
482 N.E.2d 924 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Roopchand

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILFRED ROOPCHAND…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 2, 1985

Citations

482 N.E.2d 924 (N.Y. 1985)
482 N.E.2d 924
493 N.Y.S.2d 128

Citing Cases

State v. Anderson

In light of the less than overwhelming evidence of guilt adduced at trial, the prosecutor's misconduct during…

People v. Wright

In any event, to the extent that the questions were improper, the prosecutor's misconduct was "not so…