From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Reddick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 8, 2002
293 A.D.2d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

1998-05545

Argued March 4, 2002.

April 8, 2002.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney, J.), rendered May 20, 1998, convicting him of assault in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Andrew C. Fine, New York, N.Y. (Julie Sender of counsel), for appellant.

William L. Murphy, District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Karen F. McGee and Paul A. Capofari of counsel), for respondent.

Before: NANCY E. SMITH, J.P., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, LEO F. McGINITY, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in ruling that the prosecution could inquire into the facts underlying a charge for criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, which resulted in the defendant's adjudication as a youthful offender, if the defendant testified. "It is well settled that the prosecution may inquire as to the underlying facts of a youthful offender adjudication to impeach the defendant's credibility, so long as the ultimate disposition is not elicited" (People v. Javois, 188 A.D.2d 664; see also People v. Gray, 84 N.Y.2d 709; People v. Greer, 42 N.Y.2d 170, 176).

The defendant also contends that the Supreme Court improperly denied his motion to set aside the verdict based on newly discovered evidence, pursuant to CPL 330.30(3). The motion was addressed to the sound discretion of the court, and we find that it providently exercised its discretion (see People v. Miller, 124 A.D.2d 830, 832, cert denied 481 U.S. 1071)

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

SMITH, J.P., O'BRIEN, McGINITY and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Reddick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 8, 2002
293 A.D.2d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Reddick

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. MITCHELL REDDICK, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 8, 2002

Citations

293 A.D.2d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
739 N.Y.S.2d 836

Citing Cases

Pitt v. Feagles

Thus, a criminal defendant who chooses to testify may not be impeached with a youthful offender adjudication…

Pitt v. Feagles

Thus, a criminal defendant who chooses to testify may not be impeached with a youthful offender adjudication…