From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pellegrino

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 7, 1983
60 N.Y.2d 636 (N.Y. 1983)

Summary

barring review of a guilty plea claim on preservation grounds

Summary of this case from King v. City of New York

Opinion

Decided September 7, 1983

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, WILLIAM H. LOGUEN, J.

Andrew H. Rossmer for appellant.

Mario Merola, District Attorney ( Anthony R. Dellicarri of counsel), for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed. Not having raised the issues by motion to vacate or otherwise in the court of first instance, defendant's arguments that he should be relieved of his guilty plea and that there was a failure to comply with CPL 400.21 have not been preserved for our review ( People v Pascale, 48 N.Y.2d 997; People v Bell, 47 N.Y.2d 839; People v Warren, 47 N.Y.2d 740).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and SIMONS.


Summaries of

People v. Pellegrino

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 7, 1983
60 N.Y.2d 636 (N.Y. 1983)

barring review of a guilty plea claim on preservation grounds

Summary of this case from King v. City of New York
Case details for

People v. Pellegrino

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LOUIS PELLEGRINO…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Sep 7, 1983

Citations

60 N.Y.2d 636 (N.Y. 1983)
467 N.Y.S.2d 355
454 N.E.2d 938

Citing Cases

People v. Rohan Mesquite

The defendant did not move to withdraw his plea on these grounds, and, thus, his present claim is not…

People v. Fiedler

The defendant's challenge to the sufficiency of his plea allocution to the crime of grand larceny in the…