From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. O'Keefe, Romeo, Dimbro, Banovic

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 20, 1953
306 N.Y. 619 (N.Y. 1953)

Summary

In People v. O'Keefe (306 N.Y. 619) the Judge held a private conversation with a juror, who had been accepted but before the selection of the jury had been completed, about her disinterestedness in response to an affidavit furnished by the People.

Summary of this case from People v. Colascione

Opinion

Argued October 9, 1953

Decided November 20, 1953

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, STAGG, Acting County Judge.

John Lo Pinto, Paul R. Shanahan, Harry S. Travis, John J. Cucci, Theodore H. Cohn and John J. McKinney for appellants.

Robert E. Fischer, District Attorney ( Louis M. Greenblott of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: LEWIS, Ch. J., CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL and VAN VOORHIS, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. O'Keefe, Romeo, Dimbro, Banovic

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 20, 1953
306 N.Y. 619 (N.Y. 1953)

In People v. O'Keefe (306 N.Y. 619) the Judge held a private conversation with a juror, who had been accepted but before the selection of the jury had been completed, about her disinterestedness in response to an affidavit furnished by the People.

Summary of this case from People v. Colascione
Case details for

People v. O'Keefe, Romeo, Dimbro, Banovic

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAYMOND O'KEEFE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 20, 1953

Citations

306 N.Y. 619 (N.Y. 1953)
116 N.E.2d 80

Citing Cases

People v. Roldan

Although there are no reported New York criminal cases involving the reading of a transcript…

People v. McCall

There are some logical analogies between an invasion of privacy to obtain physical evidence, an intrusion by…