From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Morris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 17, 2006
33 A.D.3d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

No. 2005-02613.

October 17, 2006.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Guzman, J.), dated February 24, 2005, which designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Before: Adams, J.P., Krausman, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court's determination designating the defendant a level three sex offender is supported by clear and convincing evidence ( see Correction Law § 168-n) and, therefore, should not be disturbed on appeal ( see People v O'Neal, 26 AD3d 365, lv denied 7 NY3d 702; People v Baylor, 19 AD3d 467; People v Smith, 5 AD3d 752; People v Stokes, 5 AD3d 651; People v Cureton, 299 AD2d 532).

The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review ( see People v. Barber, 29 AD3d 660; People v Burgess, 6 AD3d 686; People v Angelo, 3 AD3d 482; People v Cureton, supra), or are based on matter dehors the record ( see People v Gliatta, 27 AD3d 441).


Summaries of

People v. Morris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 17, 2006
33 A.D.3d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Morris

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DARRYL MORRIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 17, 2006

Citations

33 A.D.3d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 7460
821 N.Y.S.2d 922

Citing Cases

State v. Frizalone

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court's determination to designate him a level three sex…

State v. Barry

The defendant was appropriately assessed points based on the victim's physical helplessness ( see People v…