From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Merrit

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Jul 5, 2019
64 Misc. 3d 135 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)

Opinion

2016-2274 K CR

07-05-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Linwood MERRIT, Appellant.

Appellate Advocates (Sean H. Murray of counsel), for appellant. Kings County District Attorney (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel), for respondent.


Appellate Advocates (Sean H. Murray of counsel), for appellant. Kings County District Attorney (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel), for respondent.

PRESENT: MICHELLE WESTON, J.P., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, DAVID ELLIOT, JJ

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v. California (386 US 738 [1967] ), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id. ; People v. Murray , 169 AD3d 227 [2019] ; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.] , 89 AD3d 252 [2011] ; People v. Paige , 54 AD2d 631 [1976] ; cf. People v. Gonzalez , 47 NY2d 606 [1979] ).

WESTON, J.P., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Merrit

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Jul 5, 2019
64 Misc. 3d 135 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
Case details for

People v. Merrit

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Linwood Merrit…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

Date published: Jul 5, 2019

Citations

64 Misc. 3d 135 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 51112
116 N.Y.S.3d 850