People v. Memro

1 Analyses of this case by attorneys

  1. Capital Defense Weekly, April 5, 1999

    Capital Defense NewsletterApril 5, 1999

    4(b) and inconsistent with established caselaw that a trial court need not inform a jury of the consequences of deadlock. See People v. Memro, 905 P.2d 1305, 1359, 11 Cal. 4th 786, 882 (Cal. 1995). Intermediate California appellate decisions suggesting a contrary rule fly in the face of our recognition of the California Supreme Court as the "final expositor of California law."