From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Kvalheim

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 20, 1966
17 N.Y.2d 510 (N.Y. 1966)

Opinion

Argued January 11, 1966

Decided January 20, 1966

Appeal from the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, LUDWIG GLOWA, J.

Aaron E. Koota, District Attorney ( Michael Schwartz of counsel), for appellant.

Edward O. Howard and Anthony F. Marra for respondent.


Order affirmed. Dismissal of the complaint (instead of remission for a new arraignment) was proper here since defendant had already served his sentence of imprisonment ( People v. Witenski, 15 N.Y.2d 392). Since appellant appeals from that part only of the order which dismisses the complaint we make no determination as to the correctness of so much of the Appellate Term decision as holds that defendant was not properly informed of his rights.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING.


Summaries of

People v. Kvalheim

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 20, 1966
17 N.Y.2d 510 (N.Y. 1966)
Case details for

People v. Kvalheim

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. NILS KVALHEIM…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 20, 1966

Citations

17 N.Y.2d 510 (N.Y. 1966)
267 N.Y.S.2d 512
214 N.E.2d 789

Citing Cases

People v. Stewart

First, he asserts that, because he had already served his full sentence for his conviction of endangering the…

People v. Simmons

Although the appellants did not specifically request this charge, their objection to the court's instructions…